Impacts of Leisure Activity Noise Levels A Revised Case Study
AbstractAn article originally published in the International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics in 1991 discussed the effects of damaging noise levels exposed during the leisure time of industrial workers. With a noise level change preferences, this study was designed to work in collaboration with a 2013 study (Claire Drummond, 2013) which began the groundwork of measuring and examining the consistency of the data collected in 1990. Attributed to an increase in popularity of electronic music and improved digital sound equipment, indoor leisure environment sound levels have increased since the original study. The purpose of this study is to expand the collection of data on exposure levels in current leisure activities reported in the 2012 study to enhance the statistical significance that levels are indeed higher than the noise level preferences and tolerances specified by the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) and International Standards Organization (ISO) guidelines. With strenuous legal standards, industries have taken substantial steps to follow the OSHA and ISO recommended guidelines; however, places of leisure such as bars, movie theaters, churches, and sporting events are not required to adhere to the same standards. The noise data was collected using a Quest SPL (2800) calibrated dosimeter. This device is a great improvement from the GenRad Sound Level Meter originally used in the 1990 study for the fact that the Quest SPL (2800) gives a complete printout at the end of a data run that takes in account the duration and average dose of noise exposure run as well as average and peak noise levels. The GenRad device was limited to measuring low and high noise level readings. Average leisure noise levels by category were as follows: peak levels in a sample of thirty-nine leisure activities: churches and concerts (118.06 dB (σ = 2.62 dB)), bars (117.48 dB (σ = 9.32 dB)), and sporting events (122.99 dB (σ = 10.97 dB)). Following the OSHA and ISO standards, any exposure noise level over 115.00dB exceeds the recommended allowance. Adult industrial workers exposing themselves to these levels after an eight hour workday in an OSHA-controlled environment are exceeding the allowable exposure. Industrial business are spending large sums of money to make sure they are in compliance with OSHA standards yet their employees are potentially permanently damaging hearing due to their choice of leisure activity. These individuals are thus increasing their risk of a permanent threshold shift. As a side observation to the adult exposures, many parents had their children under the age of 4 in attendance at the high level peak level leisure activities. Hearing is fully developed at birth, but extended exposure times to high peak noise levels can cause an earlier permanent threshold shift in children or permanent hearing loss at a younger age.
Asfahl, Ray C. Industrial Safety and Health Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1995.
Brown , Pamela J., and Robert D. Yearout (1991). Impacts of leisure activity noise levels on safety procedures and policy in the industrial environment. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 1991; 7: 341-346.
Barger, Renee M., Donald Lisnerski, George Yates, and Robert Yearout (1999). A methodology for appropriate testing when data are heterogeneous. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1999; 24: 129-134
Calvert, D.R., and Clark, W.W. (1983). The social noise phenomenon. Newsnotes, Central Institute for the Deaf. 1983.
Drummond, Claire, Jimin Lee, Donna Parsons, Steve Patch, and Robert Yearout (2013) Impact of Leisure Activity Noise Levels, Revised (A Case Study). The 2nd Industrial and Systems Engineering World Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA
Jokitulppo, Jaana, and Lt Col Markku Toivonen (2008). Military and Leisure-Time Noise Exposure and Hearing Thresholds of Finnish Conscripts. MILITARY MEDICINE. 2008; 173. 9: 906-912. Retrieved from http://0-ehis.ebscohost.com.wncln.wncln.org/ehost/detail?vid=2&hid=23&sid=100b6e49-cdce-4053-89a7-6ff02cf37e55@sessionmgr4&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ.
Konz, Stephan, Work Design, Occupational Ergonomics. Hoboken NJ, John Wiley and Sons, 1985.
Konz, Stephan, and Steven Johnson. Work Design, Occupational Ergonomics. Scottsdale, AZ: Holcomb Hathaway
Publishers, Inc., 2004.
Milliken, G. and Johnson D. Analysis of Messy Data, Designed Experiment. Vol. 1. London: Lifetime Learning, 1984.
Lane, Mitch, Barrow, Kate, and Yearout, Robert (2012). A Systematic Methodology to Ensure OSHA Noise Level
Compliance When Production Processes are Changed (A Health & Safety Case Study). Proceedings of the 1st Annual World Conference of the Society for Industrial and Systems Engineering. 2012: 167-181.
Osborne, K., Yearout, R.and Lisnerski, D. (1997). Excessive Noise Levels that Enhance Special Effects, Are You
Aware? Advances in Occupational Ergonomics and Safety. 1997; 2:513-516.
Shirreffs, Janet H. Ph.D. (1971). Recreational Noise: Implications for Potential Hearing Loss to Participants. Journal of School Health. 1971; XLIV. 10: 548-550.
United States, (2011, November). Occupational Safety & Health Administration. Occupational Noise Exposure. Retrieved from http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/noisehearingconservation/.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The copyediting stage is intended to improve the flow, clarity, grammar, wording, and formatting of the article. It represents the last chance for the author to make any substantial changes to the text because the next stage is restricted to typos and formatting corrections. The file to be copyedited is in Word or .rtf format and therefore can easily be edited as a word processing document. The set of instructions displayed here proposes two approaches to copyediting. One is based on Microsoft Word's Track Changes feature and requires that the copy editor, editor, and author have access to this program. A second system, which is software independent, has been borrowed, with permission, from the Harvard Educational Review. The journal editor is in a position to modify these instructions, so suggestions can be made to improve the process for this journal.