Next Generation Universal Ground Control System HMI Design

Cory Anderson, Arianna Efaw, Edward Emery, John Mueller, James Schreiner

Abstract


The existing Human Machine Interface (HMI) for the Army’s Universal Ground Control Station (UGCS) represents a 1980s, windows-based technology which is neither intuitive nor scalable for operators. It creates high levels of cognitive load on the operators, and its closed architecture limits its adaptability for UAS missions as technologies evolve. This research presents a methodology for creating and evaluating next generation HMI designs while leveraging GNU Image Manipulation Program (GIMP) and TELLUS flight simulation software in the creation of five HMI prototype designs. A proof of concept approach in the evaluation of prototypes was performed with five UAS Aircraft Operators (15W MOS) and five USMA cadets; examination of the impact of age and experience on the perceived value of new HMI designs will influence recommendations on full experimental design. The value-focused approach to design presented in this paper and prototype designs provide a basis for full prototype development and experimental testing through PM UAS with the Intelligence and Maneuver Centers of Excellence. Results include a trade space and sensitivity analysis towards development of improved HMI designs. The methodology and high performing prototypes for HMI design will be integrated by the PM UAS CSI Project Office for further development and full experimental analysis.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Affairs, A. S. (2013). System Usability Scale (SUS). US Department of Health & Human Services

Retrieved March 08, 2017, from https://www.usability.gov/how-to-and-tools/methods/system-usability-scale.html

Brooke, J. (1996). SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry, 189(194), 4-7.

Clemen, R. T., & Reilly, T. (2014). Making hard decisions with Decision Tools. Mason, OH: South-Western, Cengage

Learning.

GIMP. (2017). GIMP - GNU Image Manipulation Program. Retrieved from https://www.gimp.org/

Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in psychology, 52, 139-183.

Keeney, R. L., & Keeney, R. L. (2009). Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decision-making. Harvard University Press.

MCRI. (2017). Tellus Studios. Retrieved March 9, 2017, from http://www.mcri.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/TellusFoldoutOverview-ver9d-MCR-VER-1.pdf

NASA TLX Description. (2017). Brandon Thomas, USMA Instructor. [Interview by A. Efaw]. Interview

Parnell, G. S., Driscoll, P. J., & Henderson, D. L. (Eds.). (2011). Decision making in systems engineering and management (Vol. 81). John Wiley & Sons.

Regula, K. (2017, February 28). Personal Interview.

SCI HMI Overview [PPT]. (2016). Huntsville, AL: Program Management Unmanned Ariel Systems.

Zimmerman, S. & Boike, B. (2016, August 24). Telephone Interview.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Industrial and Systems Engineering Review