Analysis of a Vendor Managed Consignment Inventory System with Kan-ban Withdrawals and Payment Delays
AbstractVendor Managed Inventory (VMI) System with Consignment Inventory (CI) policy is a solution for many supply chain leaders in a highly competitive market. In this paper, totally eight different inventory supply chain models are studied. The profit function of supplier and manufacturer in different environments are compared in order to show the profitability of the overall supply chain management system in a manufacturing industry with different time horizons. The inventory systems are applied on a supply chain consisting of a single supplier and a manufacturer. The main focus of this study is to analyze the effect of payment deferral and the time value of money in push and pull (Kanban) manufacturing systems when VMI-CI policy is applied.
Buzzell, R. D., & Ortmeyer, G. (1995). Channel partnerships streamline distribution. MIT Sloan Management Review, 36(3), 85.
Cachon, G. P., & Fisher, M. (2000). Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information. Management science, 46(8), 1032-1048.
Cárdenas-BarróN, L. E., Taleizadeh, A. A., & TreviñO-Garza, G. (2012). An improved solution to replenishment lot size problem with discontinuous issuing policy and rework, and the multi-delivery policy into economic production lot size problem with partial rework. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(18), 13540-13546..
Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E., Treviño-Garza, G., & Wee, H. M. (2012). A simple and better algorithm to solve the vendor managed inventory control system of multi-product multi-constraint economic order quantity model. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3888-3895.
Chen, F., Drezner, Z., Ryan, J. K., & Simchi-Levi, D. (2000). Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and information. Management science, 46(3), 436-443.
Christopher, M. (1999). Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Strategies for Reducing Cost and Improving Service Financial Times: Pitman Publishing. London, 1998 ISBN 0 273 63049 0 (hardback) 294+ 1× pp.
Copacino, W. C. (1993). Logistics strategy: how to get with the program. Traffic Management, 32(8), 23-24.
Cottrill, K. (1997). Reforging the supply chain. Journal of Business Strategy, 18(6), 35-39.
Darwish, M. A., & Odah, O. M. (2010). Vendor managed inventory model for single-vendor multi-retailer supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 204(3), 473-484.
Dejonckheere, J., Disney, S. M., Lambrecht, M. R., & Towill, D. R. (2003). Measuring and avoiding the bullwhip effect: A control theoretic approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(3), 567-590.
Disney, S. M., Potter, A. T., & Gardner, B. M. (2003). The impact of vendor managed inventory on transport operations. Transportation research part E: logistics and transportation review, 39(5), 363-380.
Dong, Y., & Xu, K. (2002). A supply chain model of vendor managed inventory. Transportation research part E: logistics and transportation review, 38(2), 75-95.
Gerchak, Y., & Wang, Y. (2004). Revenue‐sharing vs. wholesale‐price contracts in assembly systems with random demand. Production and operations Management, 13(1), 23-33.
Giannoccaro, I., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2004). Supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contracts. International journal of production economics, 89(2), 131-139.
GGümüş, M., Jewkes, E. M., & Bookbinder, J. H. (2008). Impact of consignment inventory and vendor-managed inventory for a two-party supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(2), 502-517.
Holmström, J., Främling, K., Kaipia, R., & Saranen, J. (2002). Collaborative planning forecasting and replenishment: new solutions needed for mass collaboration. Supply chain management: An international journal, 7(3), 136-145.
Huang, Y. F., & Lin, Y. S. (2005). An EPQ model under permissible delay in payments and cash discount. Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(2), 273-276.
Karsten, F., & Basten, R. J. (2014). Pooling of spare parts between multiple users: How to share the benefits?. European journal of operational research, 233(1), 94-104.
Lamb, M. R. (1997). Vendor managed inventory:[service center] customers like the possibilities. Metal Center News(USA), 37(2), 42-44.
Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (1997). Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management science, 43(4), 546-558.
Leuveano, A. C., Jafar, F. A. B., & Muhamad, M. R. B. (2012, August). Development of genetic algorithm on multi-vendor integrated procurement-production system under shared transportation and just-in-time delivery system. In Uncertainty Reasoning and Knowledge Engineering (URKE), 2012 2nd International Conference on (pp. 78-81). IEEE.
Li, S., Zhu, Z., & Huang, L. (2009). Supply chain coordination and decision making under consignment contract with revenue sharing. International Journal of Production Economics, 120(1), 88-99.
Michaelraj, L. A., & Shahabudeen, P. (2009). Replenishment policies for sustainable business development in a continuous credit based vendor managed inventory distribution system. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56(1), 260-266.
Pasandideh, S. H. R., Niaki, S. T. A., & Nia, A. R. (2011). A genetic algorithm for vendor managed inventory control system of multi-product multi-constraint economic order quantity model. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 2708-2716.
Piplani, R., & Viswanathan, S. (2003). A model for evaluating supplier-owned inventory strategy. International Journal of Production Economics, 81, 565-571.
Sadeghi, J., Sadeghi, S., & Niaki, S. T. A. (2014). A hybrid vendor managed inventory and redundancy allocation optimization problem in supply chain management: An NSGA-II with tuned parameters. Computers & Operations Research, 41, 53-64.
Shah, J., & Goh, M. (2006). Setting operating policies for supply hubs. International Journal of Production Economics, 100(2), 239-252.
Stalk, G., Evans, P., & Shulman, L. E. (1992). Competing on capabilities: The new rules of corporate strategy. Harvard business review, 70(2), 57-69.
Sucky, E. (2009). The bullwhip effect in supply chains—An overestimated problem?. International Journal of Production Economics, 118(1), 311-322.
Wang, Y., Jiang, L., & Shen, Z. J. (2004). Channel performance under consignment contract with revenue sharing. Management science, 50(1), 34-47.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The copyediting stage is intended to improve the flow, clarity, grammar, wording, and formatting of the article. It represents the last chance for the author to make any substantial changes to the text because the next stage is restricted to typos and formatting corrections. The file to be copyedited is in Word or .rtf format and therefore can easily be edited as a word processing document. The set of instructions displayed here proposes two approaches to copyediting. One is based on Microsoft Word's Track Changes feature and requires that the copy editor, editor, and author have access to this program. A second system, which is software independent, has been borrowed, with permission, from the Harvard Educational Review. The journal editor is in a position to modify these instructions, so suggestions can be made to improve the process for this journal.