Quantifying the Effects of Weapon Weight on Lethality through Holistic Modeling
AbstractThough it is widely known that weapon weight affects shooter stability, the quantitative effects on lethality and survivability are not well known. This issue stems from weapon lethality primarily being captured by equipment properties. A more holistic analysis can be performed by treating the soldier as a system by incorporating human factors with equipment performance specifications. This analysis requires the building of human factor models to appropriately capture lethality. The model development effort started with the collecting of data from experiments where the shot group accuracy was measured for weighted rifles. The resulting data was used to generate a mathematical model. This model, along with other human factor models, was integrated into the Weapon Lethality Service (WLS), a cloud-based simulation. The WLS was then set up to represent possible combat situations; the results were used to quantify the change in soldier lethality and survivability from changing the weapon weight.
Handley, H.A. (2017). Defining Human Capability from Soldier and Task Data. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 61, 791-95. doi:10.1177/1541931213601682
Kemnitz, C. P., Rice, V. J., Irwin, J. S., Merullo, D. J., & Johnson, R. F. (1997). The Effect of Gender, Rifle Stock Length, and Rifle Weight on Military Marksmanship and Arm-Hand Steadiness. (Technical Report T98-5) Natick, MA: U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine.
MacCalman, A.D., Sanchez, S.M., McDonald, M.L., Goerger, S.R., & Karl, A.T. (2016). Tradespace Analysis for Multiple Performance Measures. In T. M. K. Roeder, P. I. Frazier, R. Szechtman, E. Zhou, T. Huschka, and S. E. Chick (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference (3063-3074). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
Markey, A., Katz, A., Henderson, D., Jefferson, D., and Mittal, V. (2016). Modeling Human Factors for the Soldier Systems Enterprise Architecture. Presented at the General Donald R. Keith Memorial Conference, May, West Point, NY
Mittal, V. (2016). Increase in Operational Energy Requirements for Dismounted Rifle Squad between 1991 and 2014. Presented at the Military Operations Research Society Symposium, June, Quantico, VA.
Poole, E. (2009). US Army’s M26 Mass 12 Gauge. Tactical-Life.
Program Executive Officer (PEO) Soldier. (2015). Soldier System Integration Dismounted Baseline Version 2.0 for the Soldier System. Program Director Soldier Systems and Integration.
U.S. Army Maneuver Center of Excellence (MCOE). (2013). Soldier Division Portfolio Assessment Briefing to Director, Capabilities Development and Integration Directorate.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The copyediting stage is intended to improve the flow, clarity, grammar, wording, and formatting of the article. It represents the last chance for the author to make any substantial changes to the text because the next stage is restricted to typos and formatting corrections. The file to be copyedited is in Word or .rtf format and therefore can easily be edited as a word processing document. The set of instructions displayed here proposes two approaches to copyediting. One is based on Microsoft Word's Track Changes feature and requires that the copy editor, editor, and author have access to this program. A second system, which is software independent, has been borrowed, with permission, from the Harvard Educational Review. The journal editor is in a position to modify these instructions, so suggestions can be made to improve the process for this journal.